CGHM vs. XDIV
CGHM (Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF) and XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Capital Group, while XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGHM charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDIV.
Performance
CGHM vs. XDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHM achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV's 10.63% return.
CGHM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDIV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHM vs. XDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 2.65% | 5.54% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 10.63% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHM and XDIV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHM vs. XDIV — Risk / Return Rank
CGHM
XDIV
CGHM vs. XDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGHM | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGHM | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.98 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
CGHM vs. XDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, smaller than the maximum XDIV drawdown of -9.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and XDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHM | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -9.16% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -1.20% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility
CGHM vs. XDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHM | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12% | 12.31% | -9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 12.31% | -7.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 12.31% | -7.78% |
CGHM vs. XDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHM vs. XDIV - Dividend Comparison
CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 3.80% | 3.61% | 1.78% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHM and XDIV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CGHM.
CGHM has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.
CGHM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while XDIV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGHM and 0.09% for XDIV.
Find the right allocation for CGHM and XDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer