CGGO vs. VOO
CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CGGO is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGGO returned 21.81%/yr vs 22.44%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
CGGO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.
CGGO
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 20.83%
- 1Y
- 37.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
CGGO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 19.37% | 21.08% | 14.80% | 23.43% | -13.12% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -9.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGO and VOO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CGGO and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGGO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGGO
VOO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
CGGO
VOO
Industrials
CGGO
VOO
Financial Services
CGGO
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
CGGO
VOO
Communication Services
CGGO
VOO
Healthcare
CGGO
VOO
Consumer Defensive
CGGO
VOO
Basic Materials
CGGO
VOO
Energy
CGGO
VOO
Utilities
CGGO
VOO
Real Estate
CGGO
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CGGO
VOO
CGGO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGGO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.16 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | 14.73 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGGO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.39 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.89 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
CGGO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -33.99% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | -8.90% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -18.69% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.70% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -3.69% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 1.91% | +0.97% |
Volatility
CGGO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that CGGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 2.84% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 8.90% | +5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 11.80% | +4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 16.81% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 18.01% | +0.55% |
CGGO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 1.70% | 2.03% | 1.10% | 0.76% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGO and VOO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGGO has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGO dropped -24.90% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.44% vs 21.81% for CGGO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 21.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.
CGGO has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
CGGO is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGGO and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer