CGGO vs. POW
CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGGO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
CGGO vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 34.20% return.
CGGO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.74%
POW
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- YTD
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $57.79M | $52.80M | $52.76M | |
| $1.23M | $2.16M | $2.93M |
CGGO vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 15.18% | -1.00% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 34.20% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGO and POW is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGO vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
CGGO
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGGO vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGGO | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGGO vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGO | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -28.02% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -21.15% | +14.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -5.60% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | — | — |
Volatility
CGGO vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGO | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 34.35% | -13.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 34.35% | -15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 34.35% | -15.17% |
CGGO vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGO vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 1.00% | 2.03% | 1.10% | 0.76% | 0.59% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGO and POW have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGGO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGGO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
CGGO has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
CGGO is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for CGGO and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer