CGGO vs. POW

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGGO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

CGGO vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.

CGGO

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 11.98%
• YTD: 16.57%
• 1Y: 27.22%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -7.03%
• 6M: 34.18%
• YTD: 41.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGO vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	16.57%	-1.00%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	41.57%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGO and POW is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

CGGO vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGO

CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 52
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGO vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGGO	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	—	—

Drawdowns

CGGO vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGO	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-18.37%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.17%	-16.82%	+11.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-4.40%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGO	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.64%	32.91%	-13.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	32.91%	-13.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	32.91%	-13.82%

CGGO vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGO vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	0.98%	2.03%	1.10%	0.76%	0.59%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGO and POW in my portfolio?

CGGO and POW have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGO or POW?

On fees, CGGO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGO or POW?

CGGO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGO or POW?

CGGO has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between CGGO and POW?

CGGO is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.75% for POW.