CGGG vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. CGGG is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

CGGG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	2.00%	10.45%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and RBIL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	-0.27

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	4.28	-3.50

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-0.50%	-17.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	0.00%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-0.06%	-3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	0.92%	+16.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	1.05%	+16.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	1.05%	+16.45%

CGGG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and RBIL in my portfolio?

CGGG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or RBIL?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.

What is the main difference between CGGG and RBIL?

CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.17% for RBIL.