CGGG vs. IUSG
CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CGGG is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Over the past year, CGGG returned 8.30% vs 24.77% for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
CGGG vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 9.14% return.
CGGG
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -3.18%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.98%
CGGG vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | -2.35% | 10.90% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 9.14% | 14.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGG and IUSG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGG vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
CGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IUSG
CGGG vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGGG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGGG vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -63.41% | +45.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.75% | -13.07% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.16% | -5.28% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -21.40% | +17.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility
CGGG vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGG | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 16.84% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 21.06% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 20.47% | -2.21% |
CGGG vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGG vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IUSG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CGGG and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On 1-year performance, IUSG leads with 24.77% vs 8.30% for CGGG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 24.77% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGG.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.04% for IUSG.
Find the right allocation for CGGG and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer