CGGG vs. IUSG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CGGG is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.

Performance

CGGG vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.00% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUSG

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 6.40%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 13.31%
• 1Y: 33.47%
• 3Y*: 27.62%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 17.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	1.87%	10.45%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	14.00%	13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and IUSG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 61
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.38	+0.39

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and IUSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	IUSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-63.41%	+45.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.07%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-1.05%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-21.44%	+17.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	IUSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	15.71%	+1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	20.86%	-3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	20.40%	-2.94%

CGGG vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IUSG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and IUSG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, CGGG and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or IUSG?

On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or IUSG?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or IUSG?

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.

What is the main difference between CGGG and IUSG?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.04% for IUSG.