PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGG vs. FITZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGGG vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CGGG

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FITZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and FITZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGGG vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CGGG vs. FITZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGGGFITZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

-7.29

+8.06

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and FITZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGGFITZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-1.97%

-15.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-1.97%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-1.08%

-2.71%

Volatility

CGGG vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGGGFITZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.46%

8.74%

+8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

8.74%

+8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

8.74%

+8.72%

CGGG vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGGG vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CGGG and FITZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

CGGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.75% for FITZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGGG and FITZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer