CGGG vs. FITZ
CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
CGGG vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CGGG
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGGG vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | -1.30% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGG and FITZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGG vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGGG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | -7.29 | +8.06 |
Drawdowns
CGGG vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -1.97% | -15.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -1.97% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -1.08% | -2.71% |
Volatility
CGGG vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 8.74% | +8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 8.74% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 8.74% | +8.72% |
CGGG vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGG vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGG and FITZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
CGGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for CGGG and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer