CGGG vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. CGGG is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

CGGG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	2.00%	10.45%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and BNO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	-0.28

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.14	+0.64

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-87.06%	+69.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-10.29%	+8.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-40.17%	+36.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	41.46%	-23.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	35.38%	-17.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	36.68%	-19.18%

CGGG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and BNO in my portfolio?

CGGG and BNO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or BNO?

On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or BNO?

CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or BNO?

CGGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between CGGG and BNO?

CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.90% for BNO.