CGDV vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGDV returned 28.33% vs 27.00% for QQQI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

CGDV vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 10.58% return.

CGDV

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 24.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.55%	25.50%	18.39%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.58%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and QQQI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.77

The correlation between CGDV and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGDV vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGDV	QQQI
Technology	34.1%	58.1%
Industrials	13.2%	3.0%
Healthcare	11.5%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	11.3%
Communication Services	8.4%	14.2%
Financial Services	6.8%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	6.5%
Energy	3.8%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.0%
Utilities	2.1%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 78
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGDV	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.84	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.43	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.34	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	2.70	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	11.63	+1.56

CGDV vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-20.00%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-9.61%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-2.69%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-2.21%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.23%	-0.14%

Volatility

CGDV vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 4.52%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	6.10%	-1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	11.35%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	14.10%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	17.34%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.57%	17.34%	-1.77%

CGDV vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDV vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.53%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and QQQI in my portfolio?

CGDV and QQQI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGDV or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to CGDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, CGDV or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 28.33% vs 27.00% for QQQI. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGDV or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 27.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGDV or QQQI?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGDV or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between CGDV and QQQI?

CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.