CGDV vs. CGBL
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and CGBL (Capital Group Core Balanced ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGBL is a Allocation--50% to 70% Equity fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGDV returned 27.05% vs 16.28% for CGBL. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.33% expense ratio.
Performance
CGDV vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than CGBL's 7.02% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGBL
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGDV vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 12.05% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 13.47% |
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | 7.02% | 15.33% | 16.64% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and CGBL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CGDV and CGBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
CGBL
CGDV vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGDV | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.08 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 9.01 | +3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, which is greater than CGBL's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and CGBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -11.66% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -7.88% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -1.02% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -1.29% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.81% | +0.28% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) at 4.08%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 4.08% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 8.51% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 10.19% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 11.15% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 11.15% | +4.41% |
CGDV vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CGDV and CGBL have an expense ratio of 0.33%.
Dividends
CGDV vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than CGBL's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | 1.86% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and CGBL have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to CGBL (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs CGBL's -11.66%.
On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 27.05% vs 16.28% for CGBL. Both ETFs have the same 0.33% expense ratio. On volatility, CGBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 27.05% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGDV and CGBL have the same expense ratio: 0.33% per year.
CGBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.
CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CGBL is Allocation--50% to 70% Equity.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and CGBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer