CFP.TO vs. DXCM
CFP.TO (Canfor Corporation) and DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) are both stocks. CFP.TO operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials), while DXCM operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CFP.TO returned -0.63%/yr vs 16.57%/yr for DXCM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CFP.TO is traded in CAD, while DXCM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DXCM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFP.TO achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly higher than DXCM's 11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CFP.TO has underperformed DXCM with an annualized return of -0.63%, while DXCM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.57% annualized return.
CFP.TO
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 18.07%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- -11.01%
- 5Y*
- -13.03%
- 10Y*
- -0.63%
DXCM
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 23.62%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- -15.07%
- 3Y*
- -14.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.57%
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFP.TO Canfor Corporation | 18.07% | -22.73% | -14.96% | -16.24% | -33.53% | 39.51% | 89.29% | -26.56% | -33.29% | 62.28% |
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 11.04% | -18.57% | -31.94% | 7.17% | -9.63% | 43.92% | 66.17% | 73.61% | 126.45% | -9.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFP.TO and DXCM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CFP.TO and DXCM shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CFP.TO:
CA$1.61B
DXCM:
$28.64B
CFP.TO:
-CA$7.15
DXCM:
$2.31
CFP.TO:
0.31
DXCM:
6.07
CFP.TO:
0.66
DXCM:
9.69
CFP.TO:
CA$5.28B
DXCM:
$4.82B
CFP.TO:
CA$353.40M
DXCM:
$2.96B
CFP.TO:
-CA$44.40M
DXCM:
$1.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFP.TO vs. DXCM — Risk / Return Rank
CFP.TO
DXCM
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canfor Corporation (CFP.TO) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFP.TO | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.96 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.40 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | -0.68 | +0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFP.TO | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | -0.38 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.06 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | 0.35 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.59 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFP.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.71%, which is greater than DXCM's maximum drawdown of -62.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFP.TO and DXCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFP.TO | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.71% | -62.53% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.56% | -37.56% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.83% | -59.95% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.07% | -62.53% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.84% | -62.53% | -19.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -50.72% | -10.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.28% | -21.26% | -32.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.18% | 22.37% | -7.19% |
Volatility
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canfor Corporation (CFP.TO) is 11.97%, while DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that CFP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFP.TO | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.97% | 13.16% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.19% | 24.37% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.79% | 40.17% | -6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 46.15% | -9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 47.85% | -1.61% |
Dividends
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison
Neither CFP.TO nor DXCM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canfor Corporation and DexCom, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CFP.TO vs. DXCM - Profitability Comparison
CFP.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canfor Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.90M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
DXCM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 750.30M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
CFP.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canfor Corporation reported an operating income of -72.50M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.3%.
DXCM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 255.30M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.
CFP.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canfor Corporation reported a net income of -72.10M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.
DXCM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 199.50M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CFP.TO and DXCM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CFP.TO and DXCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer