PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canfor Corporation (CFP.TO) and West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFP.TO achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly higher than WFG.TO's 12.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CFP.TO has underperformed WFG.TO with an annualized return of -0.63%, while WFG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.


CFP.TO

1D
1.69%
1M
17.67%
YTD
18.07%
6M
18.58%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
-11.01%
5Y*
-13.03%
10Y*
-0.63%

WFG.TO

1D
1.78%
1M
16.52%
YTD
12.98%
6M
10.28%
1Y
-4.53%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFP.TO
Canfor Corporation
18.07%-22.73%-14.96%-16.24%-33.53%39.51%89.29%-26.56%-33.29%62.28%
WFG.TO
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
12.98%-31.32%11.51%17.78%-17.80%49.33%45.06%-13.91%-12.27%62.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CFP.TO and WFG.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 1986

0.40

Over the past year, CFP.TO and WFG.TO have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CFP.TO:

CA$1.61B

WFG.TO:

CA$7.39B

EPS

CFP.TO:

-CA$7.15

WFG.TO:

-CA$18.32

PS Ratio

CFP.TO:

0.31

WFG.TO:

1.29

PB Ratio

CFP.TO:

0.66

WFG.TO:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

CFP.TO:

CA$5.28B

WFG.TO:

CA$5.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CFP.TO:

CA$353.40M

WFG.TO:

CA$572.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

CFP.TO:

-CA$44.40M

WFG.TO:

-CA$1.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFP.TO
CFP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CFP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CFP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

WFG.TO
WFG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WFG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canfor Corporation (CFP.TO) and West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFP.TOWFG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.00

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

-0.20

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.24

-0.34

+0.57

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the WFG.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFP.TO and WFG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFP.TOWFG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

-0.14

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.09

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.25

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.24

-0.25

Drawdowns

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFP.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.71%, which is greater than WFG.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFP.TO and WFG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFP.TOWFG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.71%

-76.19%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.56%

-23.21%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.83%

-40.57%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.07%

-40.57%

-26.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.84%

-76.19%

-5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.98%

-30.32%

-30.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.28%

-22.47%

-30.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.18%

13.55%

+1.63%

Volatility

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Canfor Corporation (CFP.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) at 9.07%. This indicates that CFP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFP.TOWFG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.97%

9.07%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.19%

23.41%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.79%

31.61%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.41%

31.76%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

38.20%

+8.04%

Dividends

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Dividend Comparison

CFP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WFG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFP.TO
Canfor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFG.TO
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
1.86%2.12%1.39%1.42%1.55%0.96%0.98%1.40%1.04%0.46%0.58%0.53%

Financials

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canfor Corporation and West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
1.36B
1.31B
(CFP.TO) Total Revenue
(WFG.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

CFP.TO vs. WFG.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canfor Corporation and West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
18.2%
1.3%
Portfolio components
CFP.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canfor Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.90M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

WFG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported a gross profit of 16.72M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.

CFP.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canfor Corporation reported an operating income of -72.50M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.3%.

WFG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported an operating income of -206.56M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.

CFP.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canfor Corporation reported a net income of -72.10M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.

WFG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported a net income of -184.92M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CFP.TO and WFG.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFP.TO and WFG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer