CFO vs. UITB
CFO (VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF) and UITB (VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while UITB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Victory Capital. CFO is passively managed, while UITB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CFO returned 3.88%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for UITB. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CFO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for UITB.
Performance
CFO vs. UITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than UITB's 0.17% return.
CFO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
UITB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
CFO vs. UITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF | 6.66% | 8.60% | 15.37% | -3.56% | -14.46% | 26.02% | 19.84% | 21.64% | -8.81% | 4.90% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.17% | 7.32% | 1.81% | 6.49% | -12.23% | -0.88% | 7.99% | 11.40% | -1.31% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFO and UITB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, CFO and UITB have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFO vs. UITB — Risk / Return Rank
CFO
UITB
CFO vs. UITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.81 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 5.57 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.10 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
CFO vs. UITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, which is greater than UITB's maximum drawdown of -17.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and UITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.35% | -17.02% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -2.80% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -5.44% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | -17.02% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.61% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -4.35% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.91% | +1.01% |
Volatility
CFO vs. UITB - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) at 1.24%. This indicates that CFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 1.24% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 2.58% | +5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 3.66% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 5.64% | +7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 4.98% | +8.29% |
CFO vs. UITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFO vs. UITB - Dividend Comparison
CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than UITB's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 3.95% | 1.06% | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.49% | 1.18% | 1.35% | 1.31% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFO and UITB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFO has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to UITB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFO dropped -24.35% vs UITB's -17.02%.
On 5-year performance, CFO leads with 3.88% vs 0.56% for UITB. On fees, CFO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UITB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CFO has performed better with a 3.88% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CFO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for UITB.
UITB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 1.24% for CFO.
CFO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UITB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFO and 0.38% for UITB.
UITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFO and UITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer