PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFIT vs. GAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CFIT vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CFIT vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIT achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 4.83% return.


CFIT

1D
0.40%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.17%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GAA

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
4.83%
6M
8.44%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CFIT vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIT has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CFIT vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIT
CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIT vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFITGAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.03

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

2.70

-1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.38

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

2.87

-1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.12

11.69

-9.57

CFIT vs. GAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIT and GAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFITGAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.03

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.61

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between CFIT and GAA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CFIT vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than GAA's 3.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFIT
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF
4.31%3.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.74%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%

Drawdowns

CFIT vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIT drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum GAA drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIT and GAA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CFITGAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-26.57%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-7.18%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-3.40%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-3.90%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.76%

0.00%

Volatility

CFIT vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) is 2.90%, while Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that CFIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CFITGAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.81%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

7.24%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.45%

10.34%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

11.27%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.44%

11.05%

-5.61%