CFIT vs. BNDP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. CFIT is actively managed, while BNDP is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFIT charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.

Performance

CFIT vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIT achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than BNDP's -0.11% return.

CFIT

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -0.82%
• 6M: 2.78%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 1Y: 9.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNDP

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: -0.25%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIT vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	4.23%	-0.18%
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	-0.11%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIT and BNDP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

CFIT vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 59
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BNDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIT vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFIT	BNDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.91	—	—

Drawdowns

CFIT vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIT drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIT and BNDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIT	BNDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-2.60%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-1.75%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-0.91%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CFIT	BNDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.83%	3.70%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.63%	3.70%	+1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.63%	3.70%	+1.93%

CFIT vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIT has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFIT vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison

CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than BNDP's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	2.46%	0.24%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	3.90%	3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIT and BNDP in my portfolio?

CFIT and BNDP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CFIT or BNDP?

On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFIT or BNDP?

BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFIT or BNDP?

CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 2.46% for BNDP.

What is the main difference between CFIT and BNDP?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CFIT and 0.05% for BNDP.