CFBK vs. BCS
CFBK (CF Bankshares Inc.) and BCS (Barclays PLC) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CFBK in Banks - Regional, BCS in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, CFBK returned 16.23%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for BCS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CFBK vs. BCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFBK achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than BCS's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CFBK has outperformed BCS with an annualized return of 16.23%, while BCS has yielded a comparatively lower 15.34% annualized return.
CFBK
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 21.42%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- 1Y
- 30.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
BCS
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- 14.52%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 58.38%
- 3Y*
- 59.68%
- 5Y*
- 27.21%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
CFBK vs. BCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFBK CF Bankshares Inc. | 21.42% | -1.00% | 32.62% | -6.73% | 4.07% | 16.85% | 27.08% | 19.33% | -23.06% | 57.14% |
BCS Barclays PLC | 8.52% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFBK and BCS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1998 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CFBK and BCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CFBK:
$189.87M
BCS:
$93.65B
CFBK:
$2.78
BCS:
£2.06
CFBK:
10.81
BCS:
10.03
CFBK:
27.83
BCS:
1.81
CFBK:
1.55
BCS:
2.52
CFBK:
1.00
BCS:
0.92
CFBK:
$123.25M
BCS:
£28.57B
CFBK:
$38.77M
BCS:
£26.96B
CFBK:
$16.18M
BCS:
£9.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFBK vs. BCS — Risk / Return Rank
CFBK
BCS
CFBK vs. BCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) and Barclays PLC (BCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFBK | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.24 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 6.33 | -2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFBK vs. BCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFBK drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, roughly equal to the maximum BCS drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFBK and BCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFBK | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.31% | -94.36% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -26.20% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.46% | -26.20% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.26% | -48.14% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.71% | -66.10% | +21.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.17% | -19.30% | -71.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.34% | -38.41% | -32.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.82% | 9.25% | -0.43% |
Volatility
CFBK vs. BCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) is 6.20%, while Barclays PLC (BCS) has a volatility of 9.29%. This indicates that CFBK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFBK | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 9.29% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | 24.22% | -4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.49% | 29.47% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 34.05% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 37.60% | -2.07% |
Dividends
CFBK vs. BCS - Dividend Comparison
CFBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than BCS's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.71% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
CFBK CF Bankshares Inc. | 1.13% | 1.20% | 0.98% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CFBK vs. BCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Bankshares Inc. and Barclays PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CFBK vs. BCS - Profitability Comparison
CFBK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Bankshares Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 28.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CFBK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Bankshares Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 28.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
CFBK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Bankshares Inc. reported a net income of 4.87M and revenue of 28.13M, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CFBK and BCS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCS has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to CFBK (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFBK dropped -98.31% vs BCS's -94.36%.
BCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFBK and BCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer