CFBK vs. TSLA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA).

Performance

CFBK vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFBK vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFBK CF Bankshares Inc.	12.24%	-1.00%	32.62%	-6.73%	4.07%	16.85%	27.08%	19.33%	-23.06%	57.14%
TSLA Tesla, Inc.	-17.34%	11.36%	62.52%	101.72%	-65.03%	49.76%	743.44%	25.70%	6.89%	45.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CFBK : $177.24M TSLA : $1.32T
EPS CFBK : $2.71 TSLA : $1.08
PE Ratio CFBK : 10.29 TSLA : 345.69
PEG Ratio CFBK : 26.51 TSLA : 42.29
PS Ratio CFBK : 1.48 TSLA : 13.83
PB Ratio CFBK : 0.44 TSLA : 16.02
Total Revenue (TTM) CFBK : $120.00M TSLA : $94.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) CFBK : $37.40M TSLA : $17.09B
EBITDA (TTM) CFBK : $15.04M TSLA : $11.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFBK achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CFBK has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 15.32%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 37.10% annualized return.

CFBK

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 17.32%
• 1Y: 28.36%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

TSLA

• 1D: 4.64%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: -17.34%
• 6M: -16.41%
• 1Y: 43.44%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: 37.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CFBK vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFBK

CFBK Risk / Return Rank: 75
CFBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CFBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CFBK Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CFBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CFBK Martin Ratio Rank: 74

TSLA

TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 69
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFBK vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFBK	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	0.79	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.44	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.49	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	3.66	+0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFBK vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFBK and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFBK	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	0.79	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.19	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.63	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.72	-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between CFBK and TSLA is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CFBK vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

CFBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CFBK CF Bankshares Inc.	1.15%	1.20%	0.98%	1.18%	0.85%	0.63%	0.17%
TSLA Tesla, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CFBK vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFBK drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFBK and TSLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFBK	TSLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.31%	-73.63%	-24.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.22%	-27.48%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.26%	-73.63%	+36.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.71%	-73.63%	+28.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.84%	-24.11%	-67.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.18%	-22.77%	-48.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.23%	11.21%	-4.98%

Volatility

CFBK vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) is 6.93%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 11.25%. This indicates that CFBK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFBK	TSLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	11.25%	-4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.17%	29.73%	-10.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	55.49%	-30.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.54%	59.07%	-29.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.87%	59.03%	-23.16%

Financials

CFBK vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CF Bankshares Inc. and Tesla, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CFBK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CF Bankshares Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 26.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TSLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.01B and revenue of 24.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.1%.

CFBK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CF Bankshares Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 26.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TSLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 24.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

CFBK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CF Bankshares Inc. reported a net income of 5.56M and revenue of 26.29M, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.

TSLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 840.00M and revenue of 24.90B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.