CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE
CEUG.DE (iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - CEUG.DE tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEUG.DE returned 8.85%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEUG.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEUG.DE achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CEUG.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 8.85%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
CEUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEUG.DE iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 7.45% | 19.02% | 9.58% | 15.40% | -11.56% | 25.11% | -3.26% | 27.70% | -10.95% | 10.55% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEUG.DE and AMED.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CEUG.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEUG.DE
AMED.DE
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEUG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 2.49 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 9.40 | -3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEUG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.74 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEUG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -38.35% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -10.56% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.67% | -14.07% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.04% | -24.06% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.67% | -38.35% | +2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -0.17% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -6.69% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.81% | -0.05% |
Volatility
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) is 4.42%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that CEUG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEUG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.61% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 12.64% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 15.19% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 15.87% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 17.00% | -1.38% |
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEUG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEUG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEUG.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, CEUG.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CEUG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
CEUG.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEUG.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEUG.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer