PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SC0D.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEUG.DE
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.99%19.02%9.58%15.40%-11.56%25.11%-3.26%27.70%-10.95%10.55%
SC0D.DE
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
-1.44%22.01%10.91%22.46%-9.02%23.19%-3.03%30.01%-12.05%10.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEUG.DE achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than SC0D.DE's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CEUG.DE has underperformed SC0D.DE with an annualized return of 8.64%, while SC0D.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.


CEUG.DE

1D
2.71%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
0.99%
6M
5.84%
1Y
14.16%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
8.64%

SC0D.DE

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
1.38%
1Y
10.39%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEUG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0D.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEUG.DE
CEUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CEUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0D.DE
SC0D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SC0D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SC0D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEUG.DESC0D.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.60

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

0.91

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

4.88

+0.28

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEUG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the SC0D.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEUG.DE and SC0D.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEUG.DESC0D.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.60

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.60

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.54

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.44

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between CEUG.DE and SC0D.DE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEUG.DE nor SC0D.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum SC0D.DE drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.DE and SC0D.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CEUG.DESC0D.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-38.50%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-10.93%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-23.38%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.67%

-38.50%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.86%

-7.59%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-7.26%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.97%

-0.22%

Volatility

CEUG.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SC0D.DE) have volatilities of 6.19% and 6.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CEUG.DESC0D.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.36%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

10.93%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

17.37%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

17.26%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

18.21%

-2.63%