CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE).
CEUG.DE and 6AQQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEUG.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. 6AQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both CEUG.DE and 6AQQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEUG.DE iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.87% | 19.02% | 9.58% | 15.40% | -11.56% | 25.11% | -3.26% | 27.70% | -10.95% | 10.55% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | -4.11% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 42.90% | 3.22% | 15.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEUG.DE achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's -4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CEUG.DE has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 8.58%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 18.73% annualized return.
CEUG.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -4.11%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 18.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEUG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEUG.DE
6AQQ.DE
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEUG.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.78 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.35 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 7.01 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEUG.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.78 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.95 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.00 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEUG.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEUG.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEUG.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -31.19% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -10.01% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.04% | -31.19% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.67% | -31.19% | -4.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -7.48% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -5.40% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.35% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CEUG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.69%. This indicates that CEUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEUG.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.69% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 11.79% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 20.59% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 19.84% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 19.65% | -4.08% |