CERY vs. BSMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BSMV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CERY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, while BSMV is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CERY returned 44.30% vs 5.86% for BSMV. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. CERY charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMV.

Performance

CERY vs. BSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 29.88% return, which is significantly higher than BSMV's 0.64% return.

CERY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 29.88%
• 6M: 30.50%
• 1Y: 44.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMV

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: 5.86%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CERY vs. BSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	29.88%	15.68%	3.92%
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF	0.64%	4.03%	-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and BSMV is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	-0.12

The correlation between CERY and BSMV shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CERY vs. BSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY

CERY Risk / Return Rank: 87
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BSMV

BSMV Risk / Return Rank: 61
BSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. BSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CERY	BSMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	2.34	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	3.52	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.49	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.38	2.03	+4.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	6.34	+14.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CERY vs. BSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the BSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and BSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CERY	BSMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	2.34	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	-0.19	+2.19

Drawdowns

CERY vs. BSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum BSMV drawdown of -20.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and BSMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CERY	BSMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-20.68%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-2.79%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-5.46%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-10.45%	+8.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	0.90%	+1.25%

Volatility

CERY vs. BSMV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) at 0.82%. This indicates that CERY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CERY	BSMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	0.82%	+4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.29%	1.80%	+11.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	2.52%	+12.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	5.69%	+9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	5.69%	+9.02%

CERY vs. BSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMV's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CERY vs. BSMV - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than BSMV's 2.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF	2.90%	2.93%	3.10%	2.59%	2.21%	0.24%
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.85%	4.99%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CERY and BSMV in my portfolio?

CERY and BSMV have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CERY or BSMV?

CERY has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to BSMV (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERY dropped -10.05% vs BSMV's -20.68%.

Which ETF is better, CERY or BSMV?

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 44.30% vs 5.86% for BSMV. On fees, BSMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMV has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CERY or BSMV?

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 44.30% return vs 5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CERY or BSMV?

BSMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CERY or BSMV?

CERY has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.90% for BSMV.

What is the main difference between CERY and BSMV?

CERY is categorized as Commodities, while BSMV is Municipal Bonds. CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, while BSMV tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CERY and 0.18% for BSMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.