CERY vs. BIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CERY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CERY returned 44.30% vs 3.87% for BIL. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CERY charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.

Performance

CERY vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 29.88% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return.

CERY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 29.88%
• 6M: 30.50%
• 1Y: 44.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CERY vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	29.88%	15.68%	3.92%
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.49%	4.15%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and BIL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.04

Return for Risk

CERY vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY

CERY Risk / Return Rank: 87
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BIL

BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CERY	BIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	19.71	-16.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	174.16	-170.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	87.91	-86.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.38	355.35	-348.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	2,817.77	-2,797.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CERY vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CERY	BIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	19.71	-16.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	13.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	8.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	2.78	-0.78

Drawdowns

CERY vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and BIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CERY	BIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-0.78%	-9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-0.01%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	0.00%	-3.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-0.26%	-1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	0.00%	+2.15%

Volatility

CERY vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that CERY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CERY	BIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	0.05%	+4.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.29%	0.13%	+13.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	0.20%	+15.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	0.26%	+14.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	0.26%	+14.45%

CERY vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

CERY vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, which matches BIL's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.86%	4.13%	5.03%	4.92%	1.35%	0.00%	0.30%	2.05%	1.66%	0.68%	0.07%
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.85%	4.99%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CERY and BIL in my portfolio?

CERY and BIL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CERY or BIL?

CERY has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERY dropped -10.05% vs BIL's -0.78%.

Which ETF is better, CERY or BIL?

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 44.30% vs 3.87% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CERY or BIL?

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 44.30% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CERY or BIL?

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CERY or BIL?

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.85% for CERY.

What is the main difference between CERY and BIL?

CERY is categorized as Commodities, while BIL is Government Bonds. CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CERY and 0.14% for BIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.