PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. AGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CERY vs. AGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly higher than AGZ's 0.14% return.


CERY

1D
-0.22%
1M
7.79%
6M
15.18%
YTD
25.95%
1Y
38.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.32%

AGZ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.37%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.14%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
1.74%
ALL TIME*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.57M$1.51M$1.37M
$5.02M$9.94M$6.85M

CERY vs. AGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
25.95%15.68%3.80%
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
0.14%6.05%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and AGZ is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

-0.17

The correlation between CERY and AGZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. AGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AGZ
AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CERY vs. AGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CERYAGZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.21

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

6.46

+2.51

CERY vs. AGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the AGZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and AGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CERY vs. AGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, which is greater than AGZ's maximum drawdown of -11.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and AGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYAGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-11.01%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-1.35%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.62%

-0.81%

-5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-1.60%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

0.46%

+3.69%

Volatility

CERY vs. AGZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) at 0.66%. This indicates that CERY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CERYAGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

0.66%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

2.01%

+11.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

2.54%

+13.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

3.55%

+11.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

3.03%

+11.91%

CERY vs. AGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CERY vs. AGZ - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than AGZ's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
3.39%3.75%3.48%3.14%1.56%0.96%2.25%2.32%2.15%1.58%1.52%1.30%
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.97%4.99%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CERY and AGZ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CERY has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to AGZ (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERY dropped -14.33% vs AGZ's -11.01%.

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 38.05% vs 2.32% for AGZ. On fees, AGZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AGZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 38.05% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.

CERY has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 3.39% for AGZ.

CERY is categorized as Commodities, while AGZ is Government Bonds. CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, while AGZ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CERY and 0.20% for AGZ.

CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CERY and AGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer