PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AGZ vs. LLDYX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AGZLLDYX
YTD Return2.71%5.10%
1Y Return5.94%7.22%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.19%1.69%
5Y Return (Ann)0.86%1.98%
10Y Return (Ann)1.58%2.35%
Sharpe Ratio1.822.54
Sortino Ratio2.804.60
Omega Ratio1.341.87
Calmar Ratio0.783.63
Martin Ratio8.5824.03
Ulcer Index0.68%0.29%
Daily Std Dev3.23%2.72%
Max Drawdown-11.01%-10.54%
Current Drawdown-2.03%-0.60%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between AGZ and LLDYX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AGZ vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than LLDYX's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, AGZ has underperformed LLDYX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while LLDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.35% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.80%
3.18%
AGZ
LLDYX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGZ vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.


LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
Expense ratio chart for LLDYX: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%
Expense ratio chart for AGZ: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGZ vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AGZ, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AGZ, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AGZ, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AGZ, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AGZ, currently valued at 7.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.75
LLDYX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LLDYX, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LLDYX, currently valued at 4.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LLDYX, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.87
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LLDYX, currently valued at 3.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LLDYX, currently valued at 24.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0024.03

AGZ vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGZ and LLDYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.69
2.54
AGZ
LLDYX

Dividends

AGZ vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than LLDYX's 5.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
3.44%3.14%1.57%0.96%2.25%2.32%2.15%1.58%1.52%1.30%1.33%1.19%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
5.11%4.71%3.42%2.52%3.04%3.80%4.15%3.88%4.14%4.15%4.02%3.89%

Drawdowns

AGZ vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, roughly equal to the maximum LLDYX drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and LLDYX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.03%
-0.60%
AGZ
LLDYX

Volatility

AGZ vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) have volatilities of 0.82% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.82%
0.79%
AGZ
LLDYX