AGZ vs. GVI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI).
AGZ and GVI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Agency Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. GVI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both AGZ and GVI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGZ or GVI.
Correlation
The correlation between AGZ and GVI is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AGZ vs. GVI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AGZ:
1.05
GVI:
0.87
AGZ:
1.55
GVI:
1.26
AGZ:
1.19
GVI:
1.15
AGZ:
0.59
GVI:
0.39
AGZ:
4.01
GVI:
2.66
AGZ:
0.80%
GVI:
1.11%
AGZ:
3.04%
GVI:
3.40%
AGZ:
-11.01%
GVI:
-12.93%
AGZ:
-1.78%
GVI:
-3.29%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than GVI's 2.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGZ having a 1.58% annualized return and GVI not far behind at 1.54%.
AGZ
2.97%
0.09%
1.83%
3.18%
0.92%
1.58%
GVI
2.77%
0.07%
2.08%
2.99%
0.71%
1.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGZ vs. GVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AGZ and GVI have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGZ vs. GVI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AGZ vs. GVI - Dividend Comparison
AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than GVI's 3.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF | 3.48% | 3.14% | 1.57% | 0.96% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 2.15% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.30% | 1.33% | 1.19% |
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.40% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.46% | 1.84% | 2.29% | 2.16% | 1.91% | 1.77% | 1.75% | 1.72% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
AGZ vs. GVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, smaller than the maximum GVI drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and GVI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGZ vs. GVI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) have volatilities of 0.91% and 0.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.