PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGZ vs. GVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGZ vs. GVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than GVI's 0.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGZ having a 1.84% annualized return and GVI not far behind at 1.82%.


AGZ

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.54%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
1.84%

GVI

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.32%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGZ vs. GVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
0.29%6.05%3.08%5.18%-7.77%-1.05%5.77%5.51%1.32%2.01%
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
0.12%6.66%2.92%5.15%-8.28%-1.90%6.38%6.54%0.77%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AGZ and GVI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2008

0.69

The correlation between AGZ and GVI shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGZ vs. GVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGZ
AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GVI
GVI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVI Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGZ vs. GVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGZGVIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.59

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

2.44

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.13

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.73

6.52

+3.21

AGZ vs. GVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the GVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGZ and GVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGZGVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.59

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.27

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.52

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.76

-0.08

Drawdowns

AGZ vs. GVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, smaller than the maximum GVI drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and GVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGZGVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-12.93%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-1.79%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.85%

-2.65%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.66%

-12.93%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.01%

-12.93%

+1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.05%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-1.86%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.59%

-0.19%

Volatility

AGZ vs. GVI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) have volatilities of 0.78% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGZGVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.79%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

1.78%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

2.50%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

3.97%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.03%

3.53%

-0.50%

AGZ vs. GVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGZ and GVI have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGZ vs. GVI - Dividend Comparison

AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than GVI's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
3.72%3.75%3.48%3.14%1.56%0.96%2.25%2.32%2.15%1.58%1.52%1.30%
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
3.61%3.48%3.40%2.75%1.86%1.46%1.84%2.29%2.16%1.91%1.77%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGZ and GVI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVI has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to AGZ (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZ dropped -11.01% vs GVI's -12.93%.

On 10-year performance, AGZ leads with 1.84% vs 1.82% for GVI. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AGZ has performed better with a 1.84% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGZ and GVI have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

AGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 3.61% for GVI.

AGZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while GVI is Short-Term Bond. AGZ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD), while GVI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond.

AGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGZ and GVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer