AGZ vs. GVI
AGZ (iShares Agency Bond ETF) and GVI (iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD), while GVI is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGZ returned 1.84%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for GVI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
AGZ vs. GVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than GVI's 0.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGZ having a 1.84% annualized return and GVI not far behind at 1.82%.
AGZ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
GVI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
AGZ vs. GVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF | 0.29% | 6.05% | 3.08% | 5.18% | -7.77% | -1.05% | 5.77% | 5.51% | 1.32% | 2.01% |
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF | 0.12% | 6.66% | 2.92% | 5.15% | -8.28% | -1.90% | 6.38% | 6.54% | 0.77% | 1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGZ and GVI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2008 | 0.69 |
The correlation between AGZ and GVI shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGZ vs. GVI — Risk / Return Rank
AGZ
GVI
AGZ vs. GVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGZ | GVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.59 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 2.44 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.13 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 6.52 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGZ | GVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.59 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.76 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
AGZ vs. GVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, smaller than the maximum GVI drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and GVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGZ | GVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -12.93% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -1.79% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.85% | -2.65% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.66% | -12.93% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.01% | -12.93% | +1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -1.05% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -1.86% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.59% | -0.19% |
Volatility
AGZ vs. GVI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) have volatilities of 0.78% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGZ | GVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.79% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 1.78% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 2.50% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 3.97% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.03% | 3.53% | -0.50% |
AGZ vs. GVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AGZ and GVI have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGZ vs. GVI - Dividend Comparison
AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than GVI's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF | 3.72% | 3.75% | 3.48% | 3.14% | 1.56% | 0.96% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 2.15% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.30% |
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.61% | 3.48% | 3.40% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.46% | 1.84% | 2.29% | 2.16% | 1.91% | 1.77% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGZ and GVI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVI has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to AGZ (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZ dropped -11.01% vs GVI's -12.93%.
On 10-year performance, AGZ leads with 1.84% vs 1.82% for GVI. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AGZ has performed better with a 1.84% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZ and GVI have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
AGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 3.61% for GVI.
AGZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while GVI is Short-Term Bond. AGZ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD), while GVI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond.
AGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGZ and GVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer