PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BB vs. ETHSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BB vs. ETHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackBerry Limited (BB) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BB achieves a 124.27% return, which is significantly higher than ETHSX's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BB has underperformed ETHSX with an annualized return of 0.98%, while ETHSX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.50% annualized return.


BB

1D
0.71%
1M
-26.15%
6M
138.10%
YTD
124.27%
1Y
135.46%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
-3.50%
10Y*
0.98%
ALL TIME*
5.13%

ETHSX

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.25%
6M
0.83%
YTD
1.13%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
7.50%
ALL TIME*
17.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$142.34M$219.51M$306.93M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BB vs. ETHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BB
BlackBerry Limited
124.27%0.26%6.78%8.59%-65.13%41.03%3.27%-9.70%-36.35%62.12%
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
1.13%10.23%3.48%5.67%-9.41%22.02%13.04%25.99%5.87%16.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BB and ETHSX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1999

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between BB and ETHSX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BB vs. ETHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BB
BB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BB Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHSX
ETHSX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ETHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BB vs. ETHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackBerry Limited (BB) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBETHSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.15

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.10

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

2.53

+4.40

BB vs. ETHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BB Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the ETHSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BB and ETHSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BB vs. ETHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BB drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, which is greater than ETHSX's maximum drawdown of -90.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BB and ETHSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBETHSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.57%

-90.06%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.03%

-12.35%

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.32%

-18.91%

-43.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.01%

-19.58%

-62.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.59%

-27.43%

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.24%

-3.72%

-90.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.19%

-43.83%

-28.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.89%

5.36%

+13.53%

Volatility

BB vs. ETHSX - Volatility Comparison

BlackBerry Limited (BB) has a higher volatility of 21.28% compared to Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) at 5.88%. This indicates that BB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBETHSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.28%

5.88%

+15.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.27%

12.30%

+37.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.77%

16.11%

+43.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.43%

15.26%

+43.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.57%

16.33%

+44.24%

Dividends

BB vs. ETHSX - Dividend Comparison

BB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BB
BlackBerry Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
7.28%7.36%4.81%2.48%4.43%8.25%7.33%5.39%5.51%2.82%12.75%9.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BB and ETHSX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BB has higher volatility (21.28%) compared to ETHSX (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BB dropped -98.57% vs ETHSX's -90.06%.

BB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BB and ETHSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer