PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CENTA vs. SMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CENTA vs. SMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CENTA achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly higher than SMG's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CENTA has outperformed SMG with an annualized return of 8.82%, while SMG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.24% annualized return.


CENTA

1D
1.41%
1M
4.90%
YTD
20.97%
6M
16.00%
1Y
13.83%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
-2.71%
10Y*
8.82%

SMG

1D
1.48%
1M
-7.21%
YTD
0.90%
6M
9.39%
1Y
-7.29%
3Y*
0.02%
5Y*
-19.12%
10Y*
1.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CENTA vs. SMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CENTA
Central Garden & Pet Company
20.97%-11.68%-6.19%23.02%-25.18%31.71%23.74%-6.05%-17.13%22.04%
SMG
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
0.90%-8.01%8.28%36.92%-68.81%-18.03%96.18%77.05%-41.00%14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CENTA and SMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2007

0.37

The correlation between CENTA and SMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CENTA:

$2.19B

SMG:

$3.41B

EPS

CENTA:

$2.74

SMG:

$1.90

PE Ratio

CENTA:

12.91

SMG:

30.33

PEG Ratio

CENTA:

1.82

SMG:

0.21

PS Ratio

CENTA:

0.70

SMG:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

CENTA:

$3.16B

SMG:

$3.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CENTA:

$1.02B

SMG:

$1.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

CENTA:

$268.85M

SMG:

$493.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Central Garden & Pet Company

The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Return for Risk

CENTA vs. SMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CENTA
CENTA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CENTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CENTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CENTA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CENTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CENTA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SMG
SMG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CENTA vs. SMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CENTASMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.99

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

-0.31

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

-0.56

+1.46

CENTA vs. SMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CENTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the SMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CENTA and SMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CENTASMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

-0.22

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.41

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.03

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.21

-0.09

Drawdowns

CENTA vs. SMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CENTA drawdown since its inception was -85.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SMG drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENTA and SMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CENTASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.23%

-83.55%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.51%

-23.85%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.68%

-47.42%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.95%

-79.89%

+41.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.37%

-83.55%

+33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.07%

-72.34%

+53.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.55%

-21.14%

-8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.34%

13.14%

+2.20%

Volatility

CENTA vs. SMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) is 7.20%, while The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) has a volatility of 9.65%. This indicates that CENTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CENTASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

9.65%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

26.58%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.27%

35.73%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.93%

46.25%

-16.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.00%

40.37%

-6.37%

Dividends

CENTA vs. SMG - Dividend Comparison

CENTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CENTA
Central Garden & Pet Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMG
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
4.58%4.52%3.98%4.14%5.43%1.59%3.72%2.13%3.51%1.93%2.03%2.85%

Financials

CENTA vs. SMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Garden & Pet Company and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
906.15M
1.46B
(CENTA) Total Revenue
(SMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CENTA vs. SMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Central Garden & Pet Company and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
33.1%
41.8%
Portfolio components
CENTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 299.56M and revenue of 906.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

SMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 610.50M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.

CENTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 113.94M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

SMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 401.80M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

CENTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 79.42M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

SMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 238.60M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CENTA and SMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMG has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to CENTA (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CENTA dropped -85.23% vs SMG's -83.55%.

CENTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CENTA and SMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer