CENTA vs. SMG
CENTA (Central Garden & Pet Company) and SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) are both stocks. CENTA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while SMG operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CENTA returned 9.09%/yr vs 3.71%/yr for SMG. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CENTA vs. SMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CENTA achieves a 33.64% return, which is significantly higher than SMG's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CENTA has outperformed SMG with an annualized return of 9.09%, while SMG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.71% annualized return.
CENTA
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 33.64%
- 6M
- 32.06%
- 1Y
- 25.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
SMG
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 17.75%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 22.43%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- -15.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.71%
CENTA vs. SMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENTA Central Garden & Pet Company | 33.64% | -11.68% | -6.19% | 23.02% | -25.18% | 31.71% | 23.74% | -6.05% | -17.13% | 22.04% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 21.30% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CENTA and SMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2007 | 0.37 |
The correlation between CENTA and SMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CENTA:
$2.42B
SMG:
$4.10B
CENTA:
$2.74
SMG:
$1.90
CENTA:
14.26
SMG:
36.46
CENTA:
2.01
SMG:
0.25
CENTA:
0.77
SMG:
1.19
CENTA:
$3.16B
SMG:
$3.39B
CENTA:
$1.02B
SMG:
$1.10B
CENTA:
$268.85M
SMG:
$493.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CENTA vs. SMG — Risk / Return Rank
CENTA
SMG
CENTA vs. SMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CENTA | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.09 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.53 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.70 | 0.95 | +0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CENTA vs. SMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CENTA drawdown since its inception was -85.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SMG drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENTA and SMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CENTA | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.23% | -83.55% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.51% | -23.85% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.68% | -47.42% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -78.41% | +42.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.37% | -83.55% | +33.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.59% | -66.75% | +56.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -22.05% | -7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.33% | 13.31% | +2.02% |
Volatility
CENTA vs. SMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) is 8.33%, while The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) has a volatility of 12.34%. This indicates that CENTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CENTA | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 12.34% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 27.54% | -10.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.53% | 35.07% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 46.48% | -16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 40.50% | -6.68% |
Dividends
CENTA vs. SMG - Dividend Comparison
CENTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENTA Central Garden & Pet Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 3.81% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
Financials
CENTA vs. SMG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Garden & Pet Company and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CENTA vs. SMG - Profitability Comparison
CENTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 299.56M and revenue of 906.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
SMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 610.50M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.
CENTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 113.94M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
SMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 401.80M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
CENTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 79.42M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
SMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 238.60M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CENTA and SMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMG has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to CENTA (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CENTA dropped -85.23% vs SMG's -83.55%.
CENTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CENTA and SMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer