SMG vs. FLGT
SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) and FLGT (Fulgent Genetics, Inc.) are both stocks. SMG operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while FLGT operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, SMG returned -16.76%/yr vs -26.29%/yr for FLGT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMG vs. FLGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMG achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than FLGT's -30.80% return.
SMG
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- -16.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.73%
FLGT
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- -30.80%
- 6M
- -33.06%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- -21.12%
- 5Y*
- -26.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SMG vs. FLGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 11.08% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
FLGT Fulgent Genetics, Inc. | -30.80% | 42.23% | -36.11% | -2.92% | -70.39% | 93.07% | 303.88% | 306.94% | -27.63% | -62.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMG and FLGT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SMG and FLGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMG:
$3.75B
FLGT:
$561.42M
SMG:
$1.90
FLGT:
-$2.40
SMG:
1.09
FLGT:
1.75
SMG:
$3.39B
FLGT:
$320.35M
SMG:
$1.10B
FLGT:
$121.99M
SMG:
$493.90M
FLGT:
-$67.18M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMG vs. FLGT — Risk / Return Rank
SMG
FLGT
SMG vs. FLGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) and Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMG | FLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.11 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | -0.21 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMG vs. FLGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMG drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, smaller than the maximum FLGT drawdown of -92.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMG and FLGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMG | FLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.55% | -92.50% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.85% | -55.30% | +31.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.42% | -66.21% | +18.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.41% | -87.56% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.55% | -90.11% | +20.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -61.70% | +39.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.31% | 28.04% | -14.73% |
Volatility
SMG vs. FLGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is 10.03%, while Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that SMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMG | FLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 12.02% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.49% | 56.70% | -30.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.25% | 57.50% | -23.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 51.11% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.43% | 75.57% | -35.14% |
Dividends
SMG vs. FLGT - Dividend Comparison
SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, while FLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGT Fulgent Genetics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 4.16% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
Financials
SMG vs. FLGT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company and Fulgent Genetics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMG vs. FLGT - Profitability Comparison
SMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 610.50M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.
FLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.46M and revenue of 71.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
SMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 401.80M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
FLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. reported an operating income of -34.62M and revenue of 71.14M, resulting in an operating margin of -48.7%.
SMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 238.60M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
FLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. reported a net income of -24.83M and revenue of 71.14M, resulting in a net margin of -34.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMG and FLGT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLGT has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to SMG (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMG dropped -83.55% vs FLGT's -92.50%.
SMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMG and FLGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer