CENTA vs. CNQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ).
Performance
CENTA vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CENTA vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENTA Central Garden & Pet Company | 10.00% | -11.68% | -6.19% | 23.02% | -25.18% | 31.71% | 23.74% | -6.05% | -17.13% | 22.04% |
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 38.80% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | -19.06% | 39.72% | -29.92% | 15.97% |
Fundamentals
CENTA:
$1.99B
CNQ:
$97.27B
CENTA:
$2.47
CNQ:
$5.19
CENTA:
12.98
CNQ:
8.98
CENTA:
1.83
CNQ:
0.43
CENTA:
0.65
CNQ:
2.34
CENTA:
1.26
CNQ:
2.19
CENTA:
$3.09B
CNQ:
$41.50B
CENTA:
$992.25M
CNQ:
$12.51B
CENTA:
$314.34M
CNQ:
$18.36B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CENTA achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 38.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CENTA has underperformed CNQ with an annualized return of 9.28%, while CNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.72% annualized return.
CENTA
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- 0.90%
- 5Y*
- -4.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
CNQ
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 38.80%
- 6M
- 49.86%
- 1Y
- 56.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.72%
- 5Y*
- 31.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CENTA vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank
CENTA
CNQ
CENTA vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CENTA | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 1.79 | -1.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | 2.36 | -2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.31 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.93 | -2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 9.33 | -9.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CENTA | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.79 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.95 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.41 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CENTA and CNQ is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CENTA vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison
CENTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENTA Central Garden & Pet Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.74% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
Drawdowns
CENTA vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CENTA drawdown since its inception was -85.23%, which is greater than CNQ's maximum drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENTA and CNQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CENTA | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.23% | -80.75% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.51% | -20.04% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.79% | -35.85% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.37% | -77.84% | +27.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.41% | -7.06% | -19.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.61% | -23.64% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.06% | 6.29% | +8.77% |
Volatility
CENTA vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) is 6.36%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that CENTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CENTA | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 9.19% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 20.23% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.14% | 31.56% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 32.70% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.28% | 40.24% | -5.96% |
Financials
CENTA vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Garden & Pet Company and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CENTA vs. CNQ - Profitability Comparison
CENTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 190.61M and revenue of 617.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 9.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
CENTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 16.53M and revenue of 617.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 1.79B and revenue of 9.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
CENTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 6.84M and revenue of 617.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 5.30B and revenue of 9.60B, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.