SMG vs. LXU
SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) and LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SMG in Agricultural Inputs, LXU in Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, SMG returned 2.73%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for LXU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMG vs. LXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMG achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than LXU's 30.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SMG has outperformed LXU with an annualized return of 2.73%, while LXU has yielded a comparatively lower 2.50% annualized return.
SMG
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- -16.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.73%
LXU
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -15.26%
- YTD
- 30.00%
- 6M
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 33.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
SMG vs. LXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 11.08% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 30.00% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -30.00% | 20.36% | 323.75% | -19.29% | -23.91% | -36.99% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMG and LXU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1992 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SMG and LXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMG:
$1.90
LXU:
$0.85
SMG:
33.39
LXU:
12.99
SMG:
0.23
LXU:
0.04
SMG:
1.09
LXU:
0.93
SMG:
$3.39B
LXU:
$641.26M
SMG:
$1.10B
LXU:
$125.71M
SMG:
$493.90M
LXU:
$142.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMG vs. LXU — Risk / Return Rank
SMG
LXU
SMG vs. LXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMG | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.99 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 2.87 | -2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMG vs. LXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMG drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, smaller than the maximum LXU drawdown of -97.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMG and LXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMG | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.55% | -97.83% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.85% | -34.54% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.42% | -56.08% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.41% | -81.38% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.55% | -92.40% | +8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.55% | -70.04% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -56.23% | +34.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.31% | 11.89% | +1.42% |
Volatility
SMG vs. LXU - Volatility Comparison
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) have volatilities of 10.03% and 10.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMG | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 10.31% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.49% | 41.52% | -15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.25% | 54.92% | -20.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 62.00% | -15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.43% | 73.69% | -33.26% |
Dividends
SMG vs. LXU - Dividend Comparison
SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, while LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 4.16% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
Financials
SMG vs. LXU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company and LSB Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMG vs. LXU - Profitability Comparison
SMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 610.50M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.
LXU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.79M and revenue of 169.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
SMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 401.80M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
LXU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.16M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
SMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 238.60M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
LXU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 19.69M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMG and LXU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LXU has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to SMG (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMG dropped -83.55% vs LXU's -97.83%.
LXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMG and LXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer