SMG vs. LXU
SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) and LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SMG in Agricultural Inputs, LXU in Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, SMG returned 2.12%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for LXU. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SMG vs. LXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMG achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than LXU's 28.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMG having a 2.12% annualized return and LXU not far ahead at 2.22%.
SMG
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 10.94%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- -14.82%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.26%
LXU
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 28.00%
- 1Y
- 44.11%
- 3Y*
- -0.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.09M | $8.61M | $10.96M | |
| $71.67M | $69.95M | $61.63M |
SMG vs. LXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 14.91% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 28.00% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -30.00% | 20.36% | 323.75% | -19.29% | -23.91% | -36.99% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMG and LXU is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1992 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SMG and LXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMG:
$3.82B
LXU:
$782.69M
SMG:
$1.12
LXU:
$0.68
SMG:
58.70
LXU:
16.07
SMG:
0.41
LXU:
0.05
SMG:
1.14
LXU:
0.90
SMG:
$3.37B
LXU:
$658.06M
SMG:
$1.09B
LXU:
$114.00M
SMG:
$434.60M
LXU:
$109.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMG vs. LXU — Risk / Return Rank
SMG
LXU
SMG vs. LXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMG | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 1.11 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 2.58 | -1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMG vs. LXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMG drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, smaller than the maximum LXU drawdown of -97.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMG and LXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMG | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.55% | -97.83% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.12% | -36.97% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.42% | -55.18% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.67% | -81.38% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.55% | -91.54% | +7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.50% | -70.50% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.18% | -56.27% | +34.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 15.87% | -6.34% |
Volatility
SMG vs. LXU - Volatility Comparison
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) at 11.57%. This indicates that SMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMG | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 11.57% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.08% | 41.52% | -11.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.38% | 53.64% | -17.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 57.82% | -10.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.72% | 73.26% | -32.54% |
Dividends
SMG vs. LXU - Dividend Comparison
SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 4.02% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
Financials
SMG vs. LXU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company and LSB Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMG vs. LXU - Profitability Comparison
SMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 365.90M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.
LXU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.46M and revenue of 168.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.8%.
SMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 169.60M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.
LXU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.56M and revenue of 168.09M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.
SMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 103.60M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
LXU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of -6.19M and revenue of 168.09M, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMG and LXU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMG has higher volatility (14.53%) compared to LXU (11.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMG dropped -83.55% vs LXU's -97.83%.
LXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMG and LXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer