SMG vs. SSG
SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) is a stock, while SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). Over the past 10 years, SMG returned 1.73%/yr vs -61.29%/yr for SSG. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SMG vs. SSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMG achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than SSG's -57.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SMG has outperformed SSG with an annualized return of 1.73%, while SSG has yielded a comparatively lower -61.29% annualized return.
SMG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- -3.63%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- -15.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
SSG
- 1D
- 8.63%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- -54.30%
- YTD
- -57.11%
- 1Y
- -72.37%
- 3Y*
- -72.30%
- 5Y*
- -65.76%
- 10Y*
- -61.29%
SMG vs. SSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 11.82% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -57.11% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -67.46% | -76.50% | -63.33% | -0.79% | -51.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMG and SSG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.38 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SMG and SSG has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.38 to -0.08, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMG vs. SSG — Risk / Return Rank
SMG
SSG
SMG vs. SSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) and Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMG | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.79 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | -0.95 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | -1.62 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMG vs. SSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMG drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, smaller than the maximum SSG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMG and SSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMG | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.55% | -100.00% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.85% | -76.63% | +52.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.42% | -98.56% | +51.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -99.66% | +22.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.55% | -99.99% | +16.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.34% | -100.00% | +30.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.11% | -88.63% | +66.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 44.68% | -31.33% |
Volatility
SMG vs. SSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is 11.78%, while Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a volatility of 32.79%. This indicates that SMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMG | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 32.79% | -21.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.52% | 58.10% | -30.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.34% | 71.72% | -36.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.49% | 79.07% | -32.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.51% | 69.87% | -29.36% |
Dividends
SMG vs. SSG - Dividend Comparison
SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than SSG's 9.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 4.13% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 9.50% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMG and SSG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (32.79%) compared to SMG (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMG dropped -83.55% vs SSG's -100.00%.
SMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMG and SSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer