CENTA vs. CENT
CENTA (Central Garden & Pet Company) and CENT (Central Garden & Pet Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CENTA returned 7.78%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for CENT. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction.
Performance
CENTA vs. CENT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CENTA achieves a 29.87% return, which is significantly lower than CENT's 33.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CENTA has underperformed CENT with an annualized return of 7.78%, while CENT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.68% annualized return.
CENTA
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- YTD
- 29.87%
- 1Y
- 7.58%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.27%
CENT
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 27.25%
- YTD
- 33.90%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.17M | $3.49M | $3.27M | |
| $9.63M | $10.02M | $12.74M |
CENTA vs. CENT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENTA Central Garden & Pet Company | 29.87% | -11.68% | -6.19% | 23.02% | -25.18% | 31.71% | 23.74% | -6.05% | -17.13% | 22.04% |
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company | 33.90% | -17.14% | -1.12% | 33.81% | -28.84% | 36.31% | 24.27% | -9.81% | -11.49% | 17.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CENTA and CENT is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between CENTA and CENT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CENTA:
$2.71B
CENT:
$2.69B
CENTA:
$2.76
CENT:
$2.76
CENTA:
13.74
CENT:
15.60
CENTA:
1.94
CENT:
2.20
CENTA:
0.74
CENT:
0.85
CENTA:
1.42
CENT:
1.61
CENTA:
$3.16B
CENT:
$3.16B
CENTA:
$1.02B
CENT:
$1.02B
CENTA:
$268.85M
CENT:
$268.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CENTA vs. CENT — Risk / Return Rank
CENTA
CENT
CENTA vs. CENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) and Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CENTA | CENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.09 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 0.39 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CENTA vs. CENT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CENTA drawdown since its inception was -85.23%, roughly equal to the maximum CENT drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENTA and CENT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CENTA | CENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.23% | -86.96% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.76% | -26.86% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.68% | -38.77% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -38.77% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.37% | -49.71% | -0.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.11% | -9.04% | -4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.41% | -35.98% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.72% | 12.55% | +0.17% |
Volatility
CENTA vs. CENT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) is 6.89%, while Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that CENTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CENTA | CENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 7.35% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 18.49% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.46% | 29.26% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 31.00% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.79% | 34.47% | -0.68% |
Dividends
CENTA vs. CENT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CENTA nor CENT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CENTA vs. CENT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Garden & Pet Company and Central Garden & Pet Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CENTA vs. CENT - Profitability Comparison
CENTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 299.56M and revenue of 906.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
CENT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 299.56M and revenue of 906.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
CENTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 113.94M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
CENT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 113.94M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
CENTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 79.42M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
CENT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 79.42M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CENTA and CENT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CENT has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to CENTA (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CENTA dropped -85.23% vs CENT's -86.96%.
CENT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CENTA and CENT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer