CEMS.DE vs. SCHG
CEMS.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMS.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMS.DE returned 10.71%/yr vs 18.47%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEMS.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMS.DE achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMS.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.71%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.
CEMS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 16.75%
- 10Y*
- 18.47%
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 13.72% | 35.97% | 9.93% | 13.90% | -4.54% | 26.62% | -8.86% | 23.48% | -14.04% | 10.16% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 5.62% | 3.56% | 43.86% | 45.60% | -27.58% | 37.70% | 27.67% | 39.09% | 3.27% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMS.DE and SCHG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.36 |
The correlation between CEMS.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
CEMS.DE
SCHG
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMS.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.27 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 1.53 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 4.41 | +7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMS.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.51 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.77 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.85 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.92 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMS.DE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMS.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.20% | -31.88% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -15.64% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -28.18% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.55% | -30.34% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | -31.88% | -8.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -1.27% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -5.23% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 5.40% | -2.74% |
Volatility
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 2.87%. This indicates that CEMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMS.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 2.87% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 11.10% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 15.82% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 21.96% | -6.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 21.86% | -4.43% |
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMS.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMS.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
CEMS.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMS.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for CEMS.DE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer