CELT vs. TERG
CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
CELT vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CELT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- -15.75%
- 1M
- 27.59%
- YTD
- 227.50%
- 6M
- 210.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CELT vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | -19.49% | 9.67% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 227.50% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELT and TERG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELT vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELT vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELT | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -16.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -14.58% | — |
Volatility
CELT vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELT | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 145.85% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 145.85% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 145.85% | — |
CELT vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CELT vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELT nor TERG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELT and TERG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.
CELT and TERG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for CELT and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer