PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELT vs. TERG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CELT vs. TERG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CELT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TERG

1D
8.49%
1M
39.95%
YTD
229.64%
6M
218.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CELT
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF
-19.49%24.44%
TERG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF
229.64%28.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and TERG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELT vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CELT vs. TERG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CELTTERGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.90

Drawdowns

CELT vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CELTTERGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

Volatility

CELT vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CELTTERGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

139.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

139.25%

CELT vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CELT vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor TERG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CELT and TERG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

CELT and TERG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for TERG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CELT and TERG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer