CELT vs. TERG
CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
CELT vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CELT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- 39.95%
- YTD
- 229.64%
- 6M
- 218.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CELT vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | -19.49% | 24.44% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 229.64% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELT and TERG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELT vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CELT | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 9.90 | — |
Drawdowns
CELT vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELT | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -15.98% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.73% | — |
Volatility
CELT vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELT | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 139.25% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 139.25% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 139.25% | — |
CELT vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CELT vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELT nor TERG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELT and TERG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.
CELT and TERG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for CELT and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer