CELT vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

CELT vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: 9.00%
• 1M: 30.35%
• YTD: 562.84%
• 6M: 362.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	19.07%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	562.84%	5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and LINT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

CELT vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CELT	LINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	24.05	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-26.55%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	163.04%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	163.04%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	163.04%	—

CELT vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

CELT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.13%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and LINT in my portfolio?

CELT and LINT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for CELT.

What is the main difference between CELT and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.97% for LINT.