CELH vs. IESC
CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) and IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. CELH operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CELH returned 45.33%/yr vs 45.24%/yr for IESC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CELH vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -35.68% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 59.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CELH having a 45.33% annualized return and IESC not far behind at 45.24%.
CELH
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- 6M
- -45.91%
- YTD
- -35.68%
- 1Y
- -33.78%
- 3Y*
- -14.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 45.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 43.65%
IESC
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- 6M
- 34.98%
- YTD
- 59.64%
- 1Y
- 89.83%
- 3Y*
- 121.98%
- 5Y*
- 65.53%
- 10Y*
- 45.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.21%
CELH vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -35.68% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 59.64% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELH and IESC is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CELH and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CELH:
$7.52B
IESC:
$12.37B
CELH:
$0.61
IESC:
$18.86
CELH:
48.43
IESC:
32.93
CELH:
0.05
IESC:
0.40
CELH:
2.43
IESC:
3.45
CELH:
19.18
IESC:
11.69
CELH:
$2.97B
IESC:
$3.63B
CELH:
$1.47B
IESC:
$931.31M
CELH:
$274.27M
IESC:
$487.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELH vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
CELH
IESC
CELH vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CELH | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.25 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 4.14 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 10.34 | -11.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELH vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and IESC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELH | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -98.32% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.22% | -21.80% | -35.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.86% | -49.23% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.86% | -54.22% | -23.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.86% | -54.28% | -23.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.39% | -18.98% | -50.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.29% | -54.83% | +26.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.40% | 8.73% | +25.67% |
Volatility
CELH vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is 15.22%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 20.14%. This indicates that CELH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELH | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.22% | 20.14% | -4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.43% | 51.29% | -12.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.83% | 64.97% | -7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.35% | 54.61% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.04% | 48.23% | +20.81% |
Dividends
CELH vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELH nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CELH vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CELH vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
CELH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
CELH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
CELH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELH and IESC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to CELH (15.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELH dropped -77.86% vs IESC's -98.32%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELH and IESC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer