CEG vs. SMR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 40.06%/yr vs 5.43%/yr for SMR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CEG vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -27.96% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.

CEG

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -7.54%
• YTD: -27.96%
• 6M: -27.70%
• 1Y: -15.08%
• 3Y*: 40.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMR

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -17.31%
• YTD: -30.20%
• 6M: -46.07%
• 1Y: -75.51%
• 3Y*: 5.43%
• 5Y*: -0.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEG vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	-27.96%	58.80%	92.71%	37.24%	73.87%
SMR NuScale Power Corporation	-30.20%	-20.97%	444.98%	-67.93%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CEG and SMR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022	0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap CEG : $89.83B SMR : $3.16B
EPS CEG : $8.13 SMR : -$2.02
PS Ratio CEG : 3.31 SMR : 104.42
PB Ratio CEG : 2.68 SMR : 2.71
Total Revenue (TTM) CEG : $24.82B SMR : $18.10M
Gross Profit (TTM) CEG : $20.98B SMR : $4.45M
EBITDA (TTM) CEG : $5.87B SMR : -$696.20M

Return for Risk

CEG vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEG

CEG Risk / Return Rank: 29
CEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CEG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CEG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SMR

SMR Risk / Return Rank: 10
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEG vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEG	SMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	-0.74	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	-1.25	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.87	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	-0.91	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	-1.32	+0.54

CEG vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEG Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEG and SMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEG vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and SMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEG	SMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.70%	-87.47%	+36.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.77%	-82.86%	+43.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.70%	-82.86%	+32.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-87.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.93%	-81.49%	+44.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-35.08%	+23.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.38%	57.39%	-38.01%

Volatility

CEG vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) is 15.26%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that CEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEG	SMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	28.93%	-13.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.72%	69.57%	-31.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.66%	102.59%	-55.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.38%	93.50%	-44.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.38%	89.31%	-39.93%

Dividends

CEG vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	0.64%	0.44%	0.63%	0.97%	0.65%
SMR NuScale Power Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEG and SMR in my portfolio?

CEG and SMR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEG or SMR?

SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to CEG (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs SMR's -87.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.