CEG vs. IGV
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) is a stock, while IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 40.06%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for IGV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEG vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -27.96% return, which is significantly lower than IGV's -14.18% return.
CEG
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -27.96%
- 6M
- -27.70%
- 1Y
- -15.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -16.00%
- 1Y
- -15.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
CEG vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -27.96% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -14.18% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -28.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and IGV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between CEG and IGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
IGV
CEG vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEG | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.93 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.42 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | -0.87 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEG vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -63.45% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.77% | -36.61% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -36.61% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.93% | -23.00% | -13.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -14.45% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 17.55% | +1.83% |
Volatility
CEG vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) at 12.57%. This indicates that CEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 12.57% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.72% | 24.80% | +12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.66% | 28.06% | +18.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 27.92% | +21.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 26.39% | +22.99% |
Dividends
CEG vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.64% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and IGV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEG has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to IGV (12.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs IGV's -63.45%.
CEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer