CEFS vs. URNM
Compare and contrast key facts about Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM).
CEFS and URNM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017. URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019.
Performance
CEFS vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEFS vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 1.14% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 3.40% | 3.89% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 16.36% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 16.36% return.
CEFS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
URNM
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -15.47%
- YTD
- 16.36%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 103.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.96%
- 5Y*
- 20.50%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEFS vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFS has a 3.80% expense ratio, which is higher than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEFS vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
CEFS
URNM
CEFS vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 2.01 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.60 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.36 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 9.26 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.01 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.43 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFS and URNM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CEFS vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than URNM's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.89% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEFS vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and URNM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -50.78% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -30.79% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -50.78% | +33.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -23.96% | +21.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -17.89% | +14.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 11.19% | -9.16% |
Volatility
CEFS vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) is 4.95%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that CEFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEFS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 17.16% | -12.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 40.48% | -32.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 51.55% | -38.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 47.95% | -34.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 46.74% | -31.36% |