CEFD vs. AOR
CEFD (ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - CEFD tracks the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index while AOR tracks the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFD returned 2.89%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for AOR. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CEFD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.
Performance
CEFD vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEFD having a 6.68% return and AOR slightly higher at 6.72%.
CEFD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 13.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.91%
AOR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 15.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.52M | $20.34M | $22.31M | |
| $13.81K | $22.66K | $19.94K |
CEFD vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 6.68% | 14.15% | 20.06% | 8.36% | -28.93% | 22.09% | 23.01% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 6.72% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFD and AOR is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CEFD and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFD vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
CEFD
AOR
CEFD vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEFD | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.29 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.20 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 9.18 | -4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEFD vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFD drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFD and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFD | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -24.44% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -6.64% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -9.77% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.95% | -21.72% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -1.14% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -3.45% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.59% | +1.20% |
Volatility
CEFD vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.71%. This indicates that CEFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFD | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 2.71% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | 7.73% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 9.17% | +4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 10.67% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 10.66% | +6.56% |
CEFD vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFD vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
CEFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.87%, more than AOR's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.58% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 14.87% | 14.88% | 13.90% | 14.76% | 16.56% | 10.31% | 5.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFD and AOR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEFD has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to AOR (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFD dropped -36.95% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 5-year performance, AOR leads with 6.62% vs 2.89% for CEFD. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AOR has performed better with a 6.62% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CEFD.
CEFD has the higher dividend yield at 14.87%, compared with 2.58% for AOR.
CEFD tracks S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index, while AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CEFD and 0.15% for AOR.
AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFD and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer