PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFD vs. AIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFD vs. AIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFD achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than AIPI's 7.59% return.


CEFD

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.72%
YTD
6.43%
6M
7.27%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*

AIPI

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.44%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFD vs. AIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEFD and AIPI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.65

The correlation between CEFD and AIPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFD vs. AIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFD
CEFD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CEFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPI
AIPI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFD vs. AIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEFDAIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.61

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

4.92

+1.67

CEFD vs. AIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the AIPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFD and AIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEFD vs. AIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFD drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than AIPI's maximum drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFD and AIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFDAIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-25.25%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-14.40%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-3.58%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-4.63%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

4.70%

-1.98%

Volatility

CEFD vs. AIPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) is 4.03%, while REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that CEFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFDAIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

5.97%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

13.54%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

16.71%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

21.45%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

21.45%

-4.15%

CEFD vs. AIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFD vs. AIPI - Dividend Comparison

CEFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.71%, less than AIPI's 37.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AIPI
REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF
37.64%37.84%18.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CEFD
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN
14.71%14.88%13.90%14.76%16.56%10.31%5.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFD and AIPI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIPI has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to CEFD (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFD dropped -36.95% vs AIPI's -25.25%.

On 1-year performance, AIPI leads with 23.09% vs 17.87% for CEFD. On fees, AIPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CEFD has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIPI has performed better with a 23.09% return vs 17.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CEFD.

AIPI has the higher dividend yield at 37.64%, compared with 14.71% for CEFD.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CEFD and 0.65% for AIPI.

AIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFD and AIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer