PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFA vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFA vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 16.35% return.


CEFA

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.53%
6M
5.32%
YTD
10.56%
1Y
22.90%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.97%

IDOG

1D
-0.32%
1M
5.35%
6M
11.47%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
34.60%
3Y*
20.44%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$214.17K$182.86K$268.34K
$1.60M$1.44M$1.23M

CEFA vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
10.56%26.46%5.03%17.40%-16.66%7.97%21.61%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
16.35%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFA and IDOG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020

0.72

The correlation between CEFA and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEFA vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEFA
IDOG

Financial Services

26.4%
10.6%

Industrials

18.1%
12.3%

Technology

13.0%
7.7%

Healthcare

10.3%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
10.3%

Basic Materials

5.4%
9.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
9.5%

Energy

3.6%
9.2%

Utilities

3.0%
10.2%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Financial Services

CEFA
26.4%
IDOG
10.6%

Industrials

CEFA
18.1%
IDOG
12.3%

Technology

CEFA
13.0%
IDOG
7.7%

Healthcare

CEFA
10.3%
IDOG
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CEFA
8.6%
IDOG
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

CEFA
6.8%
IDOG
10.3%

Basic Materials

CEFA
5.4%
IDOG
9.8%

Communication Services

CEFA
3.6%
IDOG
9.5%

Energy

CEFA
3.6%
IDOG
9.2%

Utilities

CEFA
3.0%
IDOG
10.2%

Real Estate

CEFA
1.1%
IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFA vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEFA
CEFA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEFA vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEFAIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

5.43

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.23

16.84

-9.61

CEFA vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFA and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEFA vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFAIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-37.32%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-6.47%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-13.92%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-25.31%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.32%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-7.86%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.08%

+1.05%

Volatility

CEFA vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 2.95%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFAIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

2.95%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

10.82%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

13.39%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

15.64%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.09%

+0.14%

CEFA vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFA vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than IDOG's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
2.68%2.86%3.26%2.35%2.35%3.49%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.23%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFA and IDOG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEFA has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to IDOG (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 14.35% vs 7.72% for CEFA. On fees, CEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.68% for CEFA.

CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFA and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer