CEFA vs. IDEV
CEFA (Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CEFA tracks the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFA returned 6.64%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for IDEV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
CEFA vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than IDEV's 8.92% return.
CEFA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
IDEV
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFA vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 7.81% | 26.46% | 5.03% | 17.40% | -16.66% | 7.97% | 21.61% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 8.92% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 22.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFA and IDEV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CEFA and IDEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CEFA vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEFA
IDEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CEFA
IDEV
Industrials
CEFA
IDEV
Technology
CEFA
IDEV
Healthcare
CEFA
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
CEFA
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
CEFA
IDEV
Basic Materials
CEFA
IDEV
Energy
CEFA
IDEV
Communication Services
CEFA
IDEV
Utilities
CEFA
IDEV
Real Estate
CEFA
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFA vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
CEFA
IDEV
CEFA vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.08 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 8.16 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.61 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.52 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.55 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
CEFA vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -34.77% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -11.20% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -13.41% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -29.15% | -2.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.98% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -6.57% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.85% | +0.28% |
Volatility
CEFA vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.60%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.60% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 12.10% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 14.51% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 16.26% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 17.27% | -0.06% |
CEFA vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFA vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than IDEV's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 2.65% | 2.86% | 3.26% | 2.35% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.13% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CEFA and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CEFA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to IDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.48% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CEFA.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.65% for CEFA.
CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.05% for IDEV.
IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFA and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer