CEFA vs. FID
CEFA (Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CEFA tracks the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFA returned 6.64%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
CEFA vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.
CEFA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFA vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 7.81% | 26.46% | 5.03% | 17.40% | -16.66% | 7.97% | 21.61% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | 19.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFA and FID is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CEFA and FID shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CEFA vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEFA
FID
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CEFA
FID
Industrials
CEFA
FID
Technology
CEFA
FID
Healthcare
CEFA
FID
Consumer Cyclical
CEFA
FID
Consumer Defensive
CEFA
FID
Basic Materials
CEFA
FID
Energy
CEFA
FID
Communication Services
CEFA
FID
Utilities
CEFA
FID
Real Estate
CEFA
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFA vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
CEFA
FID
CEFA vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFA | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 2.30 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 3.26 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.62 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 9.14 | -2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFA | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.30 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.46 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.39 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
CEFA vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFA | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -39.79% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -8.93% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -10.97% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -29.13% | -2.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -1.11% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -8.47% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.55% | +0.58% |
Volatility
CEFA vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFA | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 3.00% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 8.12% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 10.16% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 17.04% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 18.96% | -1.75% |
CEFA vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFA vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 2.65% | 2.86% | 3.26% | 2.35% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFA and FID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEFA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, CEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.65% for CEFA.
CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFA and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer