CEFA vs. FDEV
CEFA (Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF) and FDEV (Fidelity International Multifactor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CEFA tracks the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index while FDEV tracks the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFA returned 6.64%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for FDEV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FDEV.
Performance
CEFA vs. FDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than FDEV's 3.89% return.
CEFA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEV
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- 15.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFA vs. FDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 7.81% | 26.46% | 5.03% | 17.40% | -16.66% | 7.97% | 21.61% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 3.89% | 30.36% | 5.84% | 13.37% | -16.54% | 11.00% | 15.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFA and FDEV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CEFA and FDEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.85 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CEFA vs. FDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEFA
FDEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CEFA
FDEV
Industrials
CEFA
FDEV
Technology
CEFA
FDEV
Healthcare
CEFA
FDEV
Consumer Cyclical
CEFA
FDEV
Consumer Defensive
CEFA
FDEV
Basic Materials
CEFA
FDEV
Energy
CEFA
FDEV
Communication Services
CEFA
FDEV
Utilities
CEFA
FDEV
Real Estate
CEFA
FDEV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFA vs. FDEV — Risk / Return Rank
CEFA
FDEV
CEFA vs. FDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFA | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.82 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.79 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 6.78 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFA | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.52 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CEFA vs. FDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, which is greater than FDEV's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and FDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFA | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -30.11% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -8.46% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -10.47% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -29.02% | -2.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -4.78% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -6.29% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.23% | +0.90% |
Volatility
CEFA vs. FDEV - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) at 3.61%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFA | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 3.61% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 9.68% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.90% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 13.90% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 15.33% | +1.88% |
CEFA vs. FDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFA vs. FDEV - Dividend Comparison
CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FDEV's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 2.65% | 2.86% | 3.26% | 2.35% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 2.83% | 2.86% | 2.99% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.88% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFA and FDEV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEFA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FDEV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs FDEV's -30.11%.
On 5-year performance, FDEV leads with 7.01% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, CEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDEV has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDEV.
FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.65% for CEFA.
CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while FDEV tracks Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.39% for FDEV.
CEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFA and FDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer