PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFA vs. DWMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFA vs. DWMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than DWMF's 1.89% return.


CEFA

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.62%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.59%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

DWMF

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
1.89%
6M
3.01%
1Y
7.73%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFA vs. DWMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
7.81%26.46%5.03%17.40%-16.66%7.97%21.61%
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
1.89%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFA and DWMF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.69

The correlation between CEFA and DWMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CEFA vs. DWMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEFA
DWMF

Financial Services

26.1%
20.0%

Industrials

19.2%
18.9%

Technology

10.7%
4.0%

Healthcare

10.6%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
11.5%

Basic Materials

5.7%
3.7%

Energy

4.4%
2.0%

Communication Services

3.6%
9.5%

Utilities

3.2%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
6.7%

Financial Services

CEFA
26.1%
DWMF
20.0%

Industrials

CEFA
19.2%
DWMF
18.9%

Technology

CEFA
10.7%
DWMF
4.0%

Healthcare

CEFA
10.6%
DWMF
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CEFA
8.7%
DWMF
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

CEFA
6.7%
DWMF
11.5%

Basic Materials

CEFA
5.7%
DWMF
3.7%

Energy

CEFA
4.4%
DWMF
2.0%

Communication Services

CEFA
3.6%
DWMF
9.5%

Utilities

CEFA
3.2%
DWMF
9.2%

Real Estate

CEFA
1.3%
DWMF
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFA vs. DWMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFA
CEFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFA vs. DWMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEFADWMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

0.89

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

2.61

+3.93

CEFA vs. DWMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the DWMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFA and DWMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEFADWMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.71

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.73

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Drawdowns

CEFA vs. DWMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, which is greater than DWMF's maximum drawdown of -29.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and DWMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFADWMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-29.72%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-8.74%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-8.74%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-17.00%

-14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-7.11%

+5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-3.90%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.97%

+0.16%

Volatility

CEFA vs. DWMF - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) at 3.36%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFADWMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.36%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

8.73%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

11.02%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

11.23%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

14.11%

+3.10%

CEFA vs. DWMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DWMF's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFA vs. DWMF - Dividend Comparison

CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than DWMF's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
2.65%2.86%3.26%2.35%2.35%3.49%0.84%0.00%0.00%
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.92%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFA and DWMF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEFA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to DWMF (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs DWMF's -29.72%.

On 5-year performance, DWMF leads with 8.14% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, CEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DWMF has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DWMF has performed better with a 8.14% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DWMF.

DWMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.65% for CEFA.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.38% for DWMF.

CEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFA and DWMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer