CEF vs. SLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV).
CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. SLV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price. It was launched on Apr 21, 2006.
Performance
CEF vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEF vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 5.77% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 15.03%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
SLV
- 1D
- 7.27%
- 1M
- -19.83%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 60.82%
- 1Y
- 119.88%
- 3Y*
- 45.50%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEF vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEF vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
CEF
SLV
CEF vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEF | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.11 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.20 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.82 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 8.79 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEF | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.11 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.69 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.25 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEF and SLV is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEF vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEF nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEF vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and SLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEF | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -76.28% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -42.45% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -42.45% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -42.81% | +13.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -35.47% | +16.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -44.76% | +17.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 13.63% | -6.40% |
Volatility
CEF vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) is 14.73%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 18.91%. This indicates that CEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEF | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 18.91% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 57.27% | -21.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 57.07% | -19.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 35.28% | -11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 31.36% | -9.78% |