CEF vs. RYPMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX).
CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. RYPMX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1993.
Performance
CEF vs. RYPMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEF vs. RYPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 1.40% | 148.94% | 10.14% | 4.24% | -10.57% | -8.96% | 34.25% | 52.91% | -16.56% | 7.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than RYPMX's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF has underperformed RYPMX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while RYPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.79% annualized return.
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
RYPMX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -26.51%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 95.65%
- 3Y*
- 37.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEF vs. RYPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than RYPMX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEF vs. RYPMX — Risk / Return Rank
CEF
RYPMX
CEF vs. RYPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEF | RYPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.12 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.36 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.05 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 11.29 | -1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEF | RYPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.12 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.57 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.45 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.07 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEF and RYPMX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEF vs. RYPMX - Dividend Comparison
CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 2.96% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 7.15% | 6.39% | 1.06% | 2.08% | 1.35% | 5.53% | 4.04% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
CEF vs. RYPMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum RYPMX drawdown of -81.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and RYPMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEF | RYPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -81.25% | +18.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -30.86% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -46.83% | +20.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -47.81% | +18.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -26.51% | +7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -40.48% | +13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 8.33% | -1.10% |
Volatility
CEF vs. RYPMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) is 14.73%, while Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) has a volatility of 16.06%. This indicates that CEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEF | RYPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 16.06% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 37.91% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 45.69% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 36.30% | -12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 37.25% | -15.67% |