CEF vs. FGADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX).
CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010.
Performance
CEF vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEF vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | -2.17% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | 0.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than FGADX's -2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF has underperformed FGADX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while FGADX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
FGADX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -26.97%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- 105.70%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- 23.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEF vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEF vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank
CEF
FGADX
CEF vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEF | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.52 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.76 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.42 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 12.92 | -3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEF | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.52 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.72 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.26 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEF and FGADX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEF vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison
CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.03%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 10.03% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEF vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum FGADX drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and FGADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEF | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -78.57% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -31.15% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -48.77% | +22.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -49.27% | +20.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -27.31% | +7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -34.82% | +7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 8.25% | -1.02% |
Volatility
CEF vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) is 14.73%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) has a volatility of 15.80%. This indicates that CEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEF | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 15.80% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 34.37% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 42.43% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 32.95% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 32.73% | -11.15% |