CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ESGP.DE (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while ESGP.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEBL.DE returned 22.99%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for ESGP.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.DE's 6.87% return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 55.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 0.45% |
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 6.87% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and ESGP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
ESGP.DE
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.18 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 1.83 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 5.36 | +12.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 1.02 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.39 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -20.50% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -6.31% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -20.50% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.57% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -5.31% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.16% | +0.97% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 3.24% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 8.68% | +7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 11.29% | +8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 14.54% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 14.54% | +4.40% |
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer