CEBL.DE vs. MGK
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK).
CEBL.DE and MGK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. MGK is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both CEBL.DE and MGK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEBL.DE or MGK.
Key characteristics
| CEBL.DE | MGK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.39% | 31.56% |
| 1Y Return | 20.35% | 38.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.52% | 10.27% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.95% | 20.28% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.22% | 16.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.33 | 2.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.91 | 3.07 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.43 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.74 | 3.02 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.79 | 11.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.03% | 3.56% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.54% | 17.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.09% | -48.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.05% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and MGK is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly lower than MGK's 31.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 6.22%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBL.DE vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEBL.DE vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.69% | 1.86% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% | 1.25% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -48.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and MGK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.06%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.